The title:
The author
should remember that the title will be read by perhaps thousands of people but
few, if any, will read the entire paper. Each word must therefore be chosen
with care. Abstracting and indexing services rely on the accuracy of the title;
an improperly titled paper may be lost and never reach its intended audience. The
terms in the title should be limited to those words which highlight the
significant content of the article in words that are both understandable and
retrievable. The author should ask: “how would I look for this kind of
information in an index?”
The
abstract:
The
abstract is a summary of the article. It should: (1) state the principal
objectives and scope of the investigation; (2) describe the methodology
employed; (3) summarize the results; and (4) state the principal conclusions
reached. It should not give any information or conclusion that is not stated in
the paper. The primary purpose of the abstract is to enable readers to identify
the basic content of the article quickly and accurately, and to determine its
relevance to their interests. Abstracts must not contain information which is
meaningless without referring to the text. Do not refer to illustrations and
tables. It is sensible to write the abstract after you have written the paper. Some journals (not all) require you to include
a list of keywords at the end of the abstract.
The introduction:
A good
introduction will contain the following: (1) it should present in clear outline
the nature and scope of the problem investigated; (2) it should give the
hypothesis being investigated; (3) it should give the motivation for doing the
research and the background knowledge that is considered essential for the
reader to understand the paper; (4) it might explain why the problem was
studied; (5) it should briefly review the pertinent literature; (6) it should
briefly state the method of investigation; (7) it should give the principal
results of the investigated.
Materials and
Methods:
In this
section the author should give enough detail that a competent worker can repeat
the experiments described. The careful writing of this section is critically
important because scientific convention requires that your results be reproducible-
thus you must provide the means for another researcher to reproduce your
experiments.
If your
method is new, you must give all the needed details. If the method has been
published previously in a primary journal, you need give only the literature
reference. If you modified procedure, describe what you did that was new. State
whatever statistical procedures you used on your results.
Results:
There are
two kinds of components of the results section. First, you should present the
data. Secondly, you should give some overall description of the experiments (providing
the ‘big picture’). Since the entire paper must stand or fall on the basis of
the results, they must be presented with great clarity, succinctness and, as
far as possible, simplicity. Describe on the most efficient and logical way of
showing your findings, and avoid duplication. Do not describe in detail in the
text what is obvious from the table or figure. If tables or figures tell the
main story, the text need mention only the highlights. It is sometimes sensible
to state what you did not find under the conditions of your experiment.
Discussion:
This is
often the hardest section to write. Many are too long and verbose. Apart from
the abstract, it is the section that most influences an editor when first
examining a paper. The essential features of a good discussion are: (1) try to
present the principals, relationships and generalizations shown by the results.
(2) You should state whether the data support they hypothesis being tested. (3)
You point out any exceptions or any lack of correlation among your results and
define unsettled matters. (4) Show how your results and interpretations agree
(or contrast with) previously published work. (5) Discuss the theoretical
implications of your work, as well as any possible practical applications. (6)
State your conclusions (and possibly summarize your evidence for each
conclusion.
Literature citations:
Only significant,
published works should be cited. References to unpublished data, papers in
dissertations, in press, thesis and other secondary materials are often not
acceptable and generally should be cited only sparingly or not at all.
Check all
parts of every reference against the original publication. Because there are
variations among journals in the way literature is cited, the researcher should
write out literature references in full on index cards (or some other
convenient, retrievable source) at the time they are consulted; it is then easy
to edit this information subsequently, when required to do so for purpose of
publication.
Please note that the above article was taken out the FRD Programme Series No 22, June 1995 by Dr G. Baker. Foundation for Research Development, University Development Programme, Pretoria
Please note that the above article was taken out the FRD Programme Series No 22, June 1995 by Dr G. Baker. Foundation for Research Development, University Development Programme, Pretoria